ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 is a novel disease with a highly variable and unpredictable clinical course. Various clinicodemographic factors and numerous biomarkers have been identified in studies from the West and marked as possible predictors of severe illness and mortality which may be used to triage patients for early aggressive care. This triaging becomes even more significant in resource-limited critical care settings of the Indian subcontinent. Methods: This retrospective observational study recruited 99 cases of COVID-19 admitted to intensive care from 1 May to 1 August 2020. Demographic, clinical and baseline laboratory data were collected and analysed for association with clinical outcomes, including survival and need for mechanical ventilatory support. Results: Male gender (p=0.044) and diabetes mellitus (p=0.042) were associated with increased mortality. Binomial logistic regression analysis revealed Interleukin-6 (IL6) (p=0.024), D-dimer (p=0.025) and CRP (p<0.001) as significant predictors of need of ventilatory support and IL6 (p=0.036), CRP (p=0.041), D-dimer (p=0.006) and PaO2FiO2 ratio (p=0.019) as significant predictors of mortality. CRP >40 mg/L predicted mortality with sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 88.9% (AUC 0.933) and IL6> 32.5 pg/ml with a sensitivity of 82.2% and specificity of 70.4% (AUC 0.821). Conclusion: Our results suggest that a baseline CRP >40 mg/L, IL6 >32.5 pg/ml or D-dimer >810 ng/ml are early accurate predictors of severe illness and adverse outcomes and may be used to triage patients for early intensive care.
ABSTRACT
Background Previous studies suggest that prone positioning can increase PaO2/FiO2 and reduce mortality in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Effect of prone positioning and high flow nasal oxygen has been studied individually in COVID-19 patients but their combined effect on patient's outcome is yet to be reported. Methods In this study 120 severe COVID-19 positive patients were included and placed in awake prone positioning with high flow nasal oxygen. The efficacy in improving oxygenation with prone positioning and high flow nasal oxygen were evaluated by blood gas analysis. The primary outcome was a proportion of patients requiring non-invasive ventilation or invasive ventilation. The secondary outcomes were a comparison of arterial blood gas parameters and biochemical inflammatory parameters pre proning, end of first proning and end of last prone position in these patients. Results We found only 35 patients (34.3%) required the need for non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation support whereas 67 patients (65.7%) were managed successfully on high flow nasal oxygen along with awake prone positioning (p = 0.001). We found there were statistically significant improvements in arterial blood gas parameters and biochemical inflammatory markers after the end of last prone positioning with high flow nasal oxygen. Conclusions Early application of prone positioning in combination with high flow nasal oxygen may help in avoiding mechanical ventilation by improving oxygenation and biochemical inflammatory markers.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with an increased incidence of thrombotic events, including stroke. However, characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with stroke are not well known. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of risk factors, stroke characteristics, and short-term outcomes in a large health system in New York City. We included consecutively admitted patients with acute cerebrovascular events from March 1, 2020 through April 30, 2020. Data were stratified by COVID-19 status, and demographic variables, medical comorbidities, stroke characteristics, imaging results, and in-hospital outcomes were examined. Among COVID-19-positive patients, we also summarized laboratory test results. RESULTS: Of 277 patients with stroke, 105 (38.0%) were COVID-19-positive. Compared with COVID-19-negative patients, COVID-19-positive patients were more likely to have a cryptogenic (51.8% versus 22.3%, P<0.0001) stroke cause and were more likely to suffer ischemic stroke in the temporal (P=0.02), parietal (P=0.002), occipital (P=0.002), and cerebellar (P=0.028) regions. In COVID-19-positive patients, mean coagulation markers were slightly elevated (prothrombin time 15.4±3.6 seconds, partial thromboplastin time 38.6±24.5 seconds, and international normalized ratio 1.4±1.3). Outcomes were worse among COVID-19-positive patients, including longer length of stay (P<0.0001), greater percentage requiring intensive care unit care (P=0.017), and greater rate of neurological worsening during admission (P<0.0001); additionally, more COVID-19-positive patients suffered in-hospital death (33% versus 12.9%, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline characteristics in patients with stroke were similar comparing those with and without COVID-19. However, COVID-19-positive patients were more likely to experience stroke in a lobar location, more commonly had a cryptogenic cause, and had worse outcomes.